https://stemedplus.org/stemed-groups/stemed-commons-discussion-group/ Activity feed for the group, STEMEd+ Commons Discussion Group. Mon, 21 Sep 2026 05:46:54 +0000 https://buddypress.org/?v=10.6.0 en-US 30 hourly 2 f8c5b2b27a4c6747de9f9bea43aa9d03 https://stemedplus.org/groups/stemed-commons-discussion-group/forum/topic/the-nelson-memo-open-science-and-us-federal-funding/?view=all#post-1222 Mon, 20 Apr 2026 16:30:23 +0000 Hi everyone – this is how you reply to a discussion post!

]]> c02c3868e483d14988a9ae023be7ba24 https://stemedplus.org/groups/stemed-commons-discussion-group/forum/topic/the-nelson-memo-open-science-and-us-federal-funding/ Mon, 20 Apr 2026 15:51:52 +0000 The Nelson Memo is a 2022 memo from the US Office of Science and Technology. This memo sets out the requirement for US federally-funded research – any research or data emerging from federally-funded work must be made immediately available to everyone without embargo. The memo does acknowledge the need for caution as it relates to privacy and…[Read more]

]]> 71da390e8efd3845b35a969c5736cac4 https://stemedplus.org/groups/stemed-commons-discussion-group/forum/topic/open-review-of-scholarly-products/?view=all#post-1220 Thu, 16 Apr 2026 19:00:51 +0000 Would senior folks be as ruthless if they weren’t anonymous? Or is this a part of teh disciplinary culture?

]]> 0758e269ac73322626c862b03156a0af https://stemedplus.org/groups/stemed-commons-discussion-group/forum/topic/open-review-of-scholarly-products/#post-1218 Thu, 16 Apr 2026 17:30:02 +0000 That would take a lot of community trust, and maybe training so people could be vulnerable with that process.

]]> 8bb8d863694b91d1df6d1ec26792aceb https://stemedplus.org/groups/stemed-commons-discussion-group/forum/topic/open-review-of-scholarly-products/#post-1217 Thu, 16 Apr 2026 17:28:54 +0000 I’ve had senior scientists say terrible things to me in emails, I wouldn’t want that to happen in the public for everyone to see.

 

]]> b79a6f51911e459d1146cb3e600656d5 https://stemedplus.org/groups/stemed-commons-discussion-group/forum/topic/open-review-of-scholarly-products/ Mon, 10 Nov 2025 20:54:58 +0000 Traditional peer-review often looks like submission of a manuscript, assignment of two reviewers to read and comment, authors receiving feedback, and iterative review and revision.  Peer review is typically not public nor credited. Imagine there was a platform where you could engage in the peer-review process where authors, editors, and reviewers…[Read more]

]]> 335bc71f961d16d1d4ef58cc381ae27d https://stemedplus.org/activity-feed/p/1926704/ Fri, 12 Sep 2025 18:07:24 +0000 1